On Oct 5, 2006, at 19:47 , DEV wrote:
> I have seen several posts pertaining to the "overhead" difference
> in storing
> in a db table versus the file system. What is this difference?
Well, there's not much space overhead to speak of. I tested with a
bunch of JPEG files:
$ find files | wc -l
2724
$ du -hs files
213M files
With an empty database and the following schema:
create table files (id serial, data bytea);
alter table files alter column data set storage external;
When loaded into the database:
$ du -hs /opt/local/var/db/postgresql/base/16386
223M /opt/local/var/db/postgresql/base/16386
On my MacIntel with PostgreSQL from DarwinPorts -- a configuration/
port where PostgreSQL performance does *not* shine, incidentally --
PostgreSQL can insert the image data at a pretty stable 2.5MB/s. It's
still around 30 times slower than the file system at reading the
data. (I would love to run a benchmark to provide detailed timings,
but that would tie up my laptop for too long.)
Alexander.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
