On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 06:23:02AM -0700, mdean wrote:
> used by the masses. After over a full year in reviewing the operations
> of the postgresql community, I sense a strong elitest mentality and an
> unwillingness to define and take care of customers. A formula for failure.
Well, we don't really have customers; we have a community of users.
I'm willing to go out on a limb and say that the distinction there is
something that is in fact important to that community. And before
you start lecturing me about the real world, how business works, &c.,
please know that I was one of the first major commercial users of
PostgreSQL to "come out of the closet". I understand about corporate
ways of thinking.
That said, one of the _reasons_ I noted, in starting this thread, for
holding a developers' conference only every two years was an argument
provided me by elein: it's just easier on our community, who then
don't have to worry about the travel every year. I don't think that
qualifies as "elitist". I'm not sure what is supposed to be
"elitist" about PostgreSQL, unless you mean "rigid adherence to good
programming practices". I wish more projects were so elitist.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics
problem.
--Bruce Schneier
