Re: 8.1.4 compile problem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From km
Subject Re: 8.1.4 compile problem
Date
Msg-id 20060929145536.GA2978@mrna.tn.nic.in
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.1.4 compile problem  (km <km@mrna.tn.nic.in>)
Responses Re: 8.1.4 compile problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
> > I'd say, this is expected output from configure. Configure is just a mechanism
> > to help constructing an abstraction for different types of OS (i.e. things
> > like "can we use this C type? Do we need to use another type instead?").
> > | how can i add int8,uint8,int64 and uint64 functionality into postgres ? are
> > | there any special flags that i am missing ?
> >
> > The "smallint", "integer" and "bigint" types are available regardless of that
> > output from configure.
>
> I was in a  doubt if int64,int8,uint64 and uint8 are not supported after setting up the db.
> thanks for clarifying my doubt. will proceed with gmake :)
> regards,
> KM

let me add this too:
i have compiled postgres 8.1.4 even if configure didnt detect int8,uint8,int64 and uint64.
i have tried to create a test table with datattype as int64 , but it says no such datatype, same is with uint8 an
uint64datatypes. of the four mentioned above, int8 only is recognised as a datatype. which means i have compiled
postgresqlwithout int64/uint64 support ??? 

any gotchas ?
tia

regards,
KM


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Erik Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: using schema's for data separation
Next
From: "John D. Burger"
Date:
Subject: Re: Expected accuracy of planner statistics