Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Michael Stone
Subject Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)
Date
Msg-id 20060918235810.GS6030@mathom.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)  ("Alex Turner" <armtuk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)  ("Bucky Jordan" <bjordan@lumeta.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:14:56PM -0400, Alex Turner wrote:
>If you have a table with 100million records, each of which is 200bytes long,
>that gives you roughtly 20 gig of data (assuming it was all written neatly
>and hasn't been updated much).

If you're in that range it doesn't even count as big or challenging--you
can keep it memory resident for not all that much money.

Mike Stone

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Alex Turner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)
Next
From: Marc McIntyre
Date:
Subject: LIKE query problem