Magnus,
> > 2) An easy-to-edit content section (WYSWYG CMS or Wiki),
>
> This we can already do.
Techdocs? That's still too buggy to actually use. If you ever finish it,
then we can discuss that as an alternative.
> > including pages available only to authenticated users.
>
> This we cannot currently do, but it would probably be fairly easy to do
> it.
Our concern here is that dynamic functionality in the main site takes years to
complete due to lack of resources -- techdocs, for example. We don't want a
system two years from now, we want one tommorrow. And we don't write
brand-new code for www when we already have code on another system that works
right now.
> Right. So the "intranet" part of things. Wasn't aware of that
> requirement. Sorta like the developers wiki, but for fundraising group.
> Got it.
Intra and extra. We'd also use it for fundraising campaigns, like
"Contribute to SPI so that we can have a booth at FOSS.in!" or "Contribute
to SPI so that we can fund recursive queries!". Also for doing things like
listing our voting members, explaining how SPI money is managed, etc.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
