On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:15:24 -0000
Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com> wrote:
> On 2006-09-15, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > Andrew - Supernews wrote:
> >> Numbers from an actual benchmark:
> >>
> >> int4out(0) - 0.42us/call
> >> numeric_out(0) - 0.32us/call
> >>
> >> int4out(1000000000) - 0.67us/call
> >> numeric_out(1000000000) - 0.42us/call
> >
> > Is this really int4out, or is it int8out?
>
> int4out. int8out is slower.
int8out is probably a better comparison since it is the same range.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
