Gregory Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
> >> Also Heikki points out here that it would be nice to allow for the case for a
> >> 0-byte header.
> >
> > I don't think there's enough code space for that; at least not compared
> > to its use case.
>
> Well it's irrelevant if we add a special data type to handle CHAR(1).
In that case you should probably be using "char" ...
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
