Re: transactoin id wraparound problem - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: transactoin id wraparound problem
Date
Msg-id 20060907140240.GB5892@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: transactoin id wraparound problem  ("Sriram Dandapani" <sdandapani@counterpane.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Sriram Dandapani wrote:
> Ihave a 60Gb db on which I issued a vacuumdb -a call as a superuser. It
> as been running for about 20 hours. (All client connections have been
> disabled as well as jobs that access any table). I see 0% cpu
> utilization. The vacuumdb process by itself takes about 10% memory and
> postgres uses very little cpu and some io.(10-20%).
>
> Is there a way to tell vacuumdb to use more resources so it can run
> faster?

Maybe you have the vacuum cost delay parameters set?  IIRC you should
drop vacuum_cost_delay to 0 if you want it to run as fast as possible.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Mr. Dan"
Date:
Subject: timezone Q for postgresql v814
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: timezone Q for postgresql v814