Re: [PATCHES] Another VPATH patch for ecpg - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Another VPATH patch for ecpg
Date
Msg-id 20060829210029.GE22806@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Another VPATH patch for ecpg  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:29:28PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:56:58AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Wow, I've never had CVS miss a commit (at least not through *its* error
> > ;-)).  Better look into that.
>
> No, it's probably my fault, but I fail to see what I made wrong. I
> changed the file, then ran an cvs update and then committed.

Umm, just looking at the CVS commit logs gives this odd result:


http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/compat_informix-dec_test.c.diff?r1=1.4&r2=1.5

http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/compat_informix-dec_test.c.diff?r1=1.5&r2=1.6

http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/compat_informix-dec_test.c.diff?r1=1.6&r2=1.7

(the diffs between revisions 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 and 1.7 for the
compat_informix-dec_test.c.diff file).

It changed and changed back again, very odd...

Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jaime Casanova"
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Second try committing the path changes.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors