Re: [PATCHES] updated patch for selecting large results sets - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCHES] updated patch for selecting large results sets
Date
Msg-id 200608282254.k7SMsDB16553@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Wait a minute.  What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
> > commands sent with \g use a cursor.  This patch changes SendQuery
> > so that *every* command executed via psql is treated this way.
>
> That's what I remembered.  I don't think we want to introduce a
> difference between ; and \g.

I am confused.  I assume \g and ; should be affected, like Peter says.
Tom, what *every* command are you talking about?  You mean \d?

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] updated patch for selecting large results sets in psql using cursors