Re: Atomicity? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Atomicity?
Date
Msg-id 200608282252.45608.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Atomicity?  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-general
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Sure, UNIQUE constraints are not deferrable. With normal constraints
> you can defer the check until the end of transaction and be in an
> inconsistant state for while. However, PostgreSQL doesn't support
> this for uniqueness checks.

Note that even a nondeferred unique constraint would let the command
proceed because a nondeferred constraint is checked after the
statement, not at seemingly random points during it.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Atomicity?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article