Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Monday 21 August 2006 09:47, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> >> has there been a consensus about where a replication document should go
> >> and what it should cover?
> >
> > I think the general idea is to toss it on techdocs... like the GUI Tools
> > page... http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.54
>
> Hm. I didn't know that one. There is already a section about
> replication. Chris, do you agree to put your article there?
>
> But AFAIK the goal of our discussion was to put _something_ into the
> official documentation to make it better visible. Lots of people ask for
> replication solutions, but up to now there is no official statement. So
> newcomers need to google around, figure out about lots of different
> projects, partly dead ones, etc...
>
> If we put an extensive replication article in the techdocs, we need to
> link it somehow from the main documentatino, IMHO. Otherwise it probably
> won't help that much.
I will work on a replication section for 8.2, similar to the XML docs I
posted a few days ago.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
