Re: Autovacuum on by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From ITAGAKI Takahiro
Subject Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Date
Msg-id 20060823131235.556F.ITAGAKI.TAKAHIRO@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovacuum on by default?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum on by default?
List pgsql-hackers
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote:

> And +1 on Rod's suggestion to make it more aggressive. I always drop the
> scale factor to at least 0.2 and 0.1 (though 0.1 and 0.05 don't seem
> unreasonable), and typically drop the thresholds to 200 and 100 (though
> again, lower is probably warrented).

The default fillfactors for index btree is 90%. So if we want to avoid
spliting of the leaf pages, vacuum scale factors should be less than 0.1
in cases where tuples are only updated randomly. I think threshoulds should
be less than PCTFREEs(=1-fillfactors) except ever-increasing tables.

This is a too simplified policy, but we probably need documentation for
the linkages between autovacuum and fillfactors. 

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Some minor changes to pgbench