-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:39:34PM +0400, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >AFAIR the authors have never proposed it for inclusion.
>
> We'll be glad if hstore will be in main tarball.
FWIW, I'd be glad too.
> As I remember, when we
> suggest (may be, in private exchange of letters) to include it, somebody
> says that hstore breaks "relational" in db.
This might be true, and I'm definitely not the one to judge that, but
then... geometrical data types do the same, right?
But it is way cool... imho the coolest application of gist (this
combination of bitmap hash and gist).
> Lastest version is located at http://www.sigaev.ru/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/hstore/
>
> Note, in this year there are a several questions about inclusion in mail
> lists:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-05/msg00079.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-07/msg00727.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-08/msg01412.php
> And several questions in private mail...
>
> Now hstore is stable module.
I'm planning to try my hands on using it as an rdf triple store.
Thanks for your good work
- -- tomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE7D/bBcgs9XrR2kYRAic0AJ4hmwrvnX6zNirPqJL7ygD2wLkAIgCeLsA2
xXlELrI45f12/TQG3Xrn2sA=
=fiG6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
