On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:42:11 +0300
Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net> wrote:
> > OK, that solves your problem. How about my problem where replication
> > has to happen on servers in three countries on two continents and
> > thousands of updates a second have to happen in less that 10ms?
>
> For this scenario you are far better off with partitioning than
> replication.
>
> That is if your data is partitionable. But geographically distributed
> data often is.
I agree but in this case it wasn't.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
