Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N
Date
Msg-id 20060819160314.GB23212@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:47:39AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> ALTER SEQUENCE foo_bar_seq SERIAL FOR foo.bar;

I like it, and I imagine users will love it too. Only one question:
will a sequence be limited to belonging to one table at a time, or
could you use one sequence for multiple tables and use this to declare
a dependancy on them all?

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus SERIAL, round N