Re: Autovacuum on by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Date
Msg-id 200608181408.49426.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovacuum on by default?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Re: Autovacuum on by default?
List pgsql-hackers
Am Donnerstag, 17. August 2006 18:40 schrieb Josh Berkus:
> I'm in favor of this, but do we want to turn on vacuum_delay by default
> as well?

People might complain that suddenly their vacuum runs take four times as long 
(or whatever).  Of course, if we turn on autovacuum and advocate a more or 
less hands-off vacuum policy, they won't have to care either way.  All of 
this would certainly be release-notes material.

Does anyone, for that matter, want to propose possible default parameters for 
vacuum_delay?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_regress in C
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug with initDB under windows 2003