Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date
Msg-id 200608160810.07891.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 00:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > that the bug tracker would have to have a reasonable "output" email
> > capability, but I'd not necessarily insist on being able to "input"
> > to it by mail.  Red Hat's present bugzilla system could be described
> > that way --- and while I can't say I'm in love with it, I can deal
> > with it.
>
> Bugzilla is good in that you need to sign up to report anything (or at
> least it can be configured that way, not sure), which might reduce the
> amount of noise.  The other systems that have been mentioned have by
> design little or no barrier of entry, which doesn't seem to be what we
> want.

I'm not sure I follow this, since currently anyone can email the bugs list or 
use the bugs -> email form from the website.  Are you looking to increase the 
barrier for bug reporting? 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)