Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Date
Msg-id 20060815162926.GS27928@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and  (Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>)
Responses Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:09:04PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:05:46PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >Wow, interesting. IIRC, XFS is lower performing than ext3,
>
> For xlog, maybe. For data, no. Both are definately slower than ext2 for
> xlog, which is another reason to have xlog on a small filesystem which
> doesn't need metadata journalling.

Are 'we' sure that such a setup can't lose any data? I'm worried about
files getting lost when they get written out before the metadata does.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Inner Join of the same table