Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kenneth Marshall
Subject Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date
Msg-id 20060815155328.GI13087@it.is.rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
List pgsql-hackers
RT is easy to setup/configure/use and works well with PostgreSQL
as the backend. CPAN uses it for their bug tracker. Was there a
list of features and requirements?

Ken

On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:59:52AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> >I am suggesting that.  I have heard all the old discussions about not 
> >using a bugtracker, but in all fairness, I think some of us have to 
> >create critical mass and get something started.
> 
> I will install anything, and everything, if you can get some sort of 
> concensus on which one to try / go with ... so far, all discussions have 
> ended with nobody coming close to agreeing to anything :)
> 
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
> Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: insert/update/delete returning and rules
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)