Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date
Msg-id 200608140252.k7E2qQ400656@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > This issue is closed, right?
>
> We've agreed we need two functions, but it's not done yet.  Seems pretty
> trivial though ...

OK, that's what I was unclear about.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes