Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>>> Until you have used this, it seems strange. After you start it doesn't ;-)
> >>> Sure, but with openness comes cruft, which can be a problem too. Do we
> >>> want everyone's idea of a useful feature listed? I don't.
> >> Why not as long as we have someone who can actually make "approved"
> >> todos versus wishlist type stuff.
> >
> > So you want a wish-list wiki? Great idea, I can link to it from the
> > TODO list. Is that all people want?
>
> Do you miss my point (not being sarcastic) about having:
>
> 1. Better descriptions about the todo/feature? E.g; feature specification
I am not sure there is enough churn of TODO items to make larger
descriptions worth it. As it is, I have to link to new URLs as the TODO
item is clarified.
> 2. The ability to categorize todo items
Categorize how?
> 3. Heck *your portion* of the TODO would be easily satisfied by having a
> single line with a link that points to the specific wiki page.
But who is going to do that if no one has done anything in the past for
the TODO list. I keep asking that.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
