Re: Maia Mailgard down? - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Maia Mailgard down? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200608081435.k78EZ1212146@momjian.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Maia Mailgard down? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Responses |
Re: Maia Mailgard down?
Re: Maia Mailgard down? |
List | pgsql-www |
Because all my momjian@postgresql.org email is forwarded to bruce@momjian.us, I don't have any way of training the spam filter. Is there a way I can use a global one? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > Is there any way we can return to whatever we were using before Maia > > mailgard? Maia is patently NOT working ... it's fundamentally broken in > > some way, and isn't blocking any spam. The interface for Baysian > > filtering is also awkward and darned near unusable. In a couple months > > we're going to be trying to do the PostgreSQL 8.2 release which means > > that we need the @postgresql.org e-mail addresses working ... and right > > now they're all receiving a flood of unfiltered spam, making them > > unusable. > > Actually, all MAIA is is a front-end over what we were using before > (amavisd + spamassassin) to allow individual mailboxes to configure > themselves, instead of one big site-wide setting ... I'm getting a > *trickle* of spam right now, but I've spent the past week or so going > through and training the Bayesian database ... in fact, under the old > system, those 46 messages that are currently quarantined in your cache > would have been delivered, instead of quarantined ... in the > @postgresql.org one that I monitor, there are >7k messages currently in > spam-quarantine that normally would have been passed through to the system > ... > > Not sure what you are finding awkward about the interface, but if you go > in and just turn on all the various checks, but *disable* the > quarantining, so that it just label's and passing everything over to you > to filter, you will have exactly the same thing in place that was there > before we added the interface for per-user settings ... > > Please note ... at *no time* did we ever reject spam for any mailbox, > except those for the mailing lists themselves, which majordomo is setup to > do ... so if you are seeing more now then before, its because we are being > hit with more now that are passing through spamassassin ... > > Note that unlike the ~60 messages in the cache for your mailbox right now > (12 unconfirmed non-spam, 46 unconfirmed spam), the stuff that I go > through is right now sitting at ~10k, and I generally spend about a half > hour in the evening going through it ... I generally care about > unconfirmed-spam between 5 and 10, ignoring most above that ... and > unconfirmed non-spam between 0 and 5 ... > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org > Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +