Andrew Hammond wrote:
> How about "what works with a given release at the time of the
> release"?
We just threw that idea out in the context of the procedural language
discussion because we do not have the resources to check what works.
> Arguably, neither are most of the procedural languages in the Server
> Programming section of the documentation, and yet they're included.
That is false. The documentation documents exactly those pieces of code
that we distribute.
> "There are a number of different approaches to solving the problem of
> replication, each with strengths and weaknesses. As a result, there
> are a number of different replication solutions available for
> PostgreSQL. To find out more, please refer to the website."
Well, that's what I've been talking about all along, and it has also
been the resolution at the Toronto meeting.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
