Re: [PATCHES] New variable server_version_num - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [PATCHES] New variable server_version_num
Date
Msg-id 20060730160404.GR2654@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] New variable server_version_num  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] New variable server_version_num
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:27:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:44:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The correct solution is for client-side libraries to provide the
> >> feature.
>
> > Not if the app is written in SQL, as the bootstrap, regression
> > test, etc. code for modules frequently is.
>
> SQL doesn't really have any conditional ability strong enough to
> deal with existence or non-existence of features.  What are you
> hoping to do, a CASE expression?  Both arms of the CASE still have
> to parse, so I remain unconvinced that there are real world uses.

Failure to parse means the transaction bails out, which is just what I
want in my case, as it disallows people attempting to run the
programs--they're for DBI-Link--on too early a version of PostgreSQL.
As there are some subtleties to the implementation, I need something
that quickly returns boolean or fails entirely when it detects same.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666
                              Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] New variable server_version_num