Re: GUC with units, details - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: GUC with units, details
Date
Msg-id 200607261836.52175.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC with units, details  ("Bort, Paul" <pbort@tmwsystems.com>)
Responses Re: GUC with units, details  ("Bort, Paul" <pbort@tmwsystems.com>)
Re: GUC with units, details  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bort, Paul wrote:
> The Linux kernel changed to the standard years ago. And that's just a
> few more lines of code than PostgreSQL. (
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/340 and others )

For your entertainment, here are the usage numbers from the linux-2.6.17 
kernel:

kilobyte (-i)    82
kibibyte (-i)    2
megabyte (-i)    98
mebibyte (-i)    0
gigabyte (-i)    32
gibibyte (-i)    0

KB        1151
kB        407
KiB        181
MB        3830
MiB        298
GB        815
GiB        17

So I remain unconvinced.

Of course, your general point is a good one.  If there are actually 
systems using this, it might be worth considering.  But if not, then 
we're just going to confuse people.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bort, Paul"
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC with units, details
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree