Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Mario Weilguni wrote:
> > > > > Will this patch make it into 8.2?
> > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00228.php
> > > > >
> > > > > It's a really nice feature, would be extremly useful with tools like pgpool.
> > > >
> > > > No, it will not because RESET CONNECTION can mess up interface code that
> > > > doesn't want the connection reset. We are not sure how to handle that.
> > >
> > > Hmm, what interface code are you talking about?
> >
> > I believe JDBC, for example, sets things inside the interface that would
> > be broken by RESET CONNECTION. Here is a thread about it:
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-01/msg00029.php
>
> I think we had similar problem with client encoding and solved it by
> using parameter status. Why don't we solve the JDBC problem in the
> same way?
Oh, yes, we could do that.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
