On Tuesday 11 July 2006 21:19, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 'k, isn't the Reply-To header part of an RFC somewhere? Or is it really
> an optional thing for an MUA to follow?
Well I didn't even seen the reply-to in the email when it came across. So that
may be one problem. But just as a note I found this:
A reply to must conform to the below... (e.g. just an email isn't enough).
Reply-To: "Mary Smith: Personal Account" <smith@home.example>
>
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:20, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> checking ot make sure it works and gives the right answer ...
> >
> > Kmail ignores it
> >
> >> ----
> >> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
> >> (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org
> >> MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org
> >> ICQ . 7615664
> >>
> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
> >
> > --
> > === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
> > Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
> > Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
> > http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
> Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
