Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take
Date
Msg-id 200606271907.k5RJ75I10301@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Applied.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > Seeing stats_command_string with almost zero overhead is great news!
> > > Should we remove that setting and just have it enabled all
> > > the time?
> >
> > If you don't need it, you shouldn't have to pay any overhead for it,
> > I think.  One could make an argument now for having stats_command_string
> > default to ON, though.
>
> The attached patch makes stats_command_string default to 'on', and
> updates the documentation.
>
> > Something that might also be interesting is an option to suppress
> > per-command ps_status reporting.  On machines where updating ps status
> > takes a kernel call, there's now a pretty good argument why you might
> > want to turn that off and rely on pg_stat_activity instead.
>
> OK, can I get a timing report from someone with the title on/off that
> shows a difference?
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
>   EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>   + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>        subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Saito"
Date:
Subject: Client build of MSVC6+ patch
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: Client build of MSVC6+ patch