Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Date
Msg-id 200606271618.k5RGINR27070@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC  (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>)
Responses Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
PFC wrote:
> 
> > My idea is that if an UPDATE places the new tuple on the same page as
> > the old tuple, it will not create new index entries for any indexes
> > where the key doesn't change.
> 
>     Basically the idea behind preventing index bloat by updates is to have  
> one index tuple point to several actual tuples having the same value.
>     

The idea is not to avoid index bloat, but to allow heap reuse, and having
one index entry for multiple versions of an UPDATEd row is merely an
implementation detail.

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC