Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> I assume the conclusion from this email thread is that though the idea
> is interesting, the complexity added would not be worth the saving of a
> few bytes.
I have same understanding about it. Besides the complexity,
there is trade-off between cpu and i/o resources.
Also, there is another approach in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-12/msg00258.php ,
where 2byte header version of varlena is suggested. It is more simple, but
it may double intrinsic text types (shorttext, shortchar and shortvarchar).
I assume it is worth the saving of a few bytes in particular for indexes
on VLDBs, but my patch is still incomplete and needs more works.
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
