Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS] - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS]
Date
Msg-id 200606150201.k5F21kB23030@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS]  (John Hansen <john@geeknet.com.au>)
Responses Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS]
List pgsql-www
John Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 21:34 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > John Hansen wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 08:48 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > > >> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> > > > > >>> (The fact that archives.p.o can't properly link between threads that
> > > > > >>> cross month boundaries is pretty annoying...)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Indeed, I was just annoyed by that (again) a few minutes ago.  Anyone
> > > > > >> on -www have an idea how to fix it?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am also having problems that the date sorting often has a few entries
> > > > > > at the end of out of order.  I think that needs to be fixed too.
> > > > >
> > > > > please provide a sample of what you are talking about ... :)
> > > >
> > > > Sure, search for "misnomer" and sorty by date.  Look at the last page.
> > > > You will see 2005 entries that should have appeared earlier.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thats due to a bug in the search engine, not the archives themselves.
> >
> > OK, how does it get fixed?
>
> Someone needs to fix the ASPseek source...

Have we submitted a bug report to them?

--
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: John Hansen
Date:
Subject: Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS]
Next
From: John Hansen
Date:
Subject: Re: archive threads across months (was Re: [HACKERS]