Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>I don't see why views should be special. Tables clearly should be
> >>because we can open them directly.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Ah, I didn't think of that. Good idea. So we don't need this patch?
> >
> >
> >
>
> why do we agree on a patch, implement it and reject it then?
> would be easier to reject it before actually implementing it ...
> it is quite hard to explain to a customer that something is rejected
> after approval - even if things are written properly ...
Agreed. The problem with this patch is that originally we just wanted
views, and later the idea of putting a query in there was agreed on, so
the feature request has changed over time.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
