Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Ranges for well-ordered types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: Ranges for well-ordered types
Date
Msg-id 20060611054530.GA26654@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ranges for well-ordered types  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
Responses Re: Ranges for well-ordered types  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:18:11 +0900, Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> wrote:
> 
> Time (and timestamp) is a bit of a issue conceptually. The "default"  
> successor function would depend on the precision of the timestamp.  

And in the ideal case it doesn't exist. That is why I think a closed, open
interval is a better way to go.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),
Next
From: Michael Glaesemann
Date:
Subject: Re: Ranges for well-ordered types