Re: ADD/DROP constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: ADD/DROP constraints
Date
Msg-id 20060608210655.GA45331@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to ADD/DROP constraints  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: ADD/DROP constraints  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 04:30:22PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Or maybe I should insist that a matching constraint name be present *and* that
> the source text match? That's more of a pain to code though.

That could also break some partitioning schemes; I don't think it's a
given that parents and children have matching constraints, and afaik a
parent can have constraints that a child doesn't.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: ADD/DROP INHERITS
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work