Re: reindexdb command utlility - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: reindexdb command utlility
Date
Msg-id 200606071702.k57H28l06437@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reindexdb command utlility  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: reindexdb command utlility
List pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Patch applied.  Thanks.
>
> Why is this an improvement?  AFAIR an INFO message is *not suppressible*
> by adjusting client_min_messages, therefore this makes the system more
> chatty not less so.  It certainly doesn't do anything to address the
> original complaint.

I thought it needed changing for consistency.  Shouldn't status messages
like this be INFO:

    test=> REINDEX DATABASE test;
    NOTICE:  table "pg_class" was reindexed
    NOTICE:  table "sql_languages" was reindexed
    NOTICE:  table "sql_packages" was reindexed
    NOTICE:  table "sql_parts" was reindexed

If I do VACUUM VERBOSE, those messages are INFO.

--
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: reindexdb command utlility
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: reindexdb command utlility