Moving to -hackers
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 12:32:38AM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> >I just noticed that psql's unformatted output uses too much
> >memory. Is it normal? It seems that psql draws all records
> >of a query off the server before it displays or writes the output.
> >I would expect this only with formatted output.
> >
> >Problem is, I have an export that produces 500'000+ records
> >which changes frequently. Several (20+) sites run this query
> >nightly with different parameters and download it. The SELECTs
> >that run in psql -A -t -c '...' may overlap and the query that runs
> >in less than 1.5 minutes if it's the only one at the time may take
> >3+ hours if ten such queries overlap. The time is mostly spent
> >in swapping, all psql processes take up 300+ MB, so the 1GB
> >server is brought to its knees quickly, peek swap usage is 1.8 GB.
> >I watched the progress in top and the postmaster processes finished
> >their work in about half an hour (that would still be acceptable)
> >then the psql processes started eating up memory as they read
> >the records.
> >
> >PostgreSQL 8.1.4 was used on RHEL3.
> >
> >Is there a way to convince psql to use less memory in unformatted
> >mode? I know COPY will be able to use arbitrary SELECTs
> >but until then I am still stuck with redirecting psql's output.
>
> The answer it to use SELECT INTO TEMP and then COPY.
> Psql will use much less memory that way. But still...
I've been able to verify this on 8.1.4; psql -A -t -c 'SELECT * FROM
largetable' > /dev/null results in psql consuming vast quantities of
memory. Why is this? ISTM this is a bug...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
