Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
Date
Msg-id 20060524195715.42444.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users  ("Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej.groups@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-novice
> On 5/25/06, operationsengineer1@yahoo.com
> > imho, both are acceptably fast for the vast
> majority
> > of applications (which is why i went with features
> -
> > not the least of which was the license) and if it
> gets
> > so big it grinds to a halt, you are likely in the
> > commercial db space, anyway.
> /me has seen highly expensive, poorly designed
> Oracle implementations
> on amazing hardware grind to a halt ... :}

touche!  from what i could tell, the fix was mostly to
prevent bad php developing from allowing sql
injection.  iow, it wasn't an inherent problem in
pgsql assuming good programming practices...  using
bind variables in your queries.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users
Next
From: Brad Nicholson
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked