You may be comparing the values to Tom's suggestion to bump up work_mem. Take a look at the original posting (Total runtime: 777208.041 ms for the bitmap scan)
-Steve
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 12:53:16PM -0700, Stephen Byers wrote:
> Yes, here are the runtimes for the repeated query.
> Total runtime: 748716.750 ms
> Total runtime: 749170.934 ms
> Total runtime: 744113.594 ms
> Total runtime: 746314.251 ms
> Total runtime: 742083.732 ms
With which options enabled? This isn't even close to any of the three times
you already posted.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.
