Re: performance question (something to do w/ - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: performance question (something to do w/
Date
Msg-id 20060508175013.GY99570@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: performance question (something to do w/  (Mark Lewis <mark.lewis@mir3.com>)
Responses Re: performance question (something to do w/
Re: performance question (something to do w/
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:42:21AM -0700, Mark Lewis wrote:
> Doing a SELECT with a large list of variables inside an IN runs slowly
> on every database we've tested.  We've tested mostly in Oracle and
> PostgreSQL, and both get very slow very quickly (actually Oracle refuses
> to process the query at all after it gets too many bind parameters).
>
> In our case, we have a (potentially quite large) set of external values
> that we want to look up in the database.  We originally thought that
> doing a single select with a large IN clause was the way to go, but then
> we did some performance analysis on the optimal batch size (number of
> items to include per IN clause), and discovered that for most databases,
> the optimal batch size was 1.  For PostgreSQL I think it was 2.
>
> The moral of the story is that you're probably better off running a
> bunch of small selects than in trying to optimize things with one
> gargantuan select.

Ever experiment with loading the parameters into a temp table and
joining to that?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database!
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: performance question (something to do w/