On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 12:27:41 -0500, "kernel.alert kernel.alert" <kernel.alert@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi list...
>
> Please i have a problem with this...
>
> I create the follow tables...
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> CREATE TABLE empresa (
> id_empresa integer NOT NULL primary key,
> nombre varchar(45),
> );
> CREATE TABLE casino (
> id_casino integer NOT NULL,
> id_empresa integer REFERENCES empresa(id_empresa),
>
> nombre varchar(45),
>
> primary key(id_casino,id_empresa)
> );
> CREATE TABLE maq_casino (
> id_empresa integer NOT NULL REFERENCES casino(id_empresa),
> id_casino integer NOT NULL REFERENCES casino(id_casino),
>
> ubicacion_sala varchar(45) default NULL,
> primary key(id_empresa,id_casino,id_tipo_maquina,id_maq_casino)
> );
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> When i'm gonna to create the last table i got this error:
>
> ERROR: no hay restriccion unique que coincida con las columnas dadas en la
> tabla referida <<casino>>
>
> That in english is like .. there is no a unique constraint with columns
> referred in casino table.
>
>
> Please where is the problem...
Unless there is a performance problem, id_empresa should not appear in the
maq_casino table at all, since it is derivable from id_casino.
Is id_empresa really allowed to be NULL in casino?
If there is an actual performance problem and you really need to have it in
the mag_casino table, then you want to add another unique key (id_casino,
id_empresa) in casino and then change casino_mag to have a foreign key
reference on (id_casino, id_impresa) to casino instead of the individual
references you have now.
If id_empresa in casino_mag is not supposed to be tied to the value of
id_casino (which I doubt is the case), then it should be referencing
empresa instead of casino.
