Re: The planner chooses seqscan+sort when there is an index on the sort column - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andreas Kretschmer
Subject Re: The planner chooses seqscan+sort when there is an index on the sort column
Date
Msg-id 20060503155432.GA18128@KanotixBox
Whole thread Raw
In response to The planner chooses seqscan+sort when there is an index on the sort column  (Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>)
Responses Re: The planner chooses seqscan+sort when there is an  (Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>)
List pgsql-general
Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com> schrieb:
> select * from table order by col_1;

Without a WHERE you get the whole table.

A Index-Scan is, in this case, expensive.


HTH, Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect.                              (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly."    (unknow)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe.              N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "John D. Burger"
Date:
Subject: Re: The planner chooses seqscan+sort when there is an index on the sort column
Next
From: Csaba Nagy
Date:
Subject: Re: The planner chooses seqscan+sort when there is an