On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:19:50 -0400,
Kynn Jones <kynnjo@gmail.com> wrote:
> I keep bumping against this situation: I have a main database A, and I want
> to implement a database B, that is distinct from A, but subordinate to it,
> meaning that it refers to data in A, but not vice versa.
>
> I don't simply want to add new tables to A to implement B, because this
> unnecessarily clutters A's schema with tables that entirely extraneous to
> it.
>
> Is there some other way?
Have you looked at schemas?
