On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 07:42:53AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> Yes. And the estimates are bad enough (orders of magnitude) that I can't
> help but wonder whether pg could come up with a better plan with better
> statistics:
>
>>>>> -> Index Scan using activity_pk on activity (cost=0.00..40717259.91
>>>>> rows=6538650 width=8) (actual time=207356.050..207356.722 rows=100
>>>>> loops=1) Filter: ((state = 10000) OR (state = 10001))
Isn't the rows=100 here because of the LIMIT?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
