Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update
Date
Msg-id 20060320141955.GQ15742@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update  (Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:38:30PM -0500, Rod Taylor wrote:
> One example might be a 'self-aggregating' structure. Start with one
> entry per minute in a table indexed by time. After 2 weeks passes, the
> per-minute data is aggregated and the single entry at the start of the
> day is updated with the aggregate value with the other entries for the
> day being removed. I believe this can cause significant index bloat
> since it results in a few entries per page in the index.

FYI, that's exactly what http://rrs.decibel.org does (yeah, I know,
viewcvs is down... :( )
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about MemoryContexts and functions that returns sets.
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals --Important