On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
>> 'k, but what is wrong with "Portions copyright by ..." added to the
>> appropriate files? Why is that "A Bad Thing"?
>
> I wouldn't object to "Portions copyright Joe Blow" in addition to the
> PGDG copyright notice. The big problem with the way that the plpgsql
> and pltcl files stood was that they also had their own license notices,
> which while generally BSD-like were not exactly the same as the top
> COPYRIGHT file. That I think is a seriously bad idea. We ought to have
> one and only one set of license terms for everything in the core
> distribution.
re: license ... agreed
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
