Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 20060307092409.GC31738@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:50:15PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >I thought we ran the Converity analysis a year ago and cleaned up the
> >warnings, so I am surprised at our high number, but I assume they are
> >mostly noise.
>
> Got an account and will take a look at the details this evening ... :)

Are the people who look at the results allowed to tell the rest of us
what kind of bugs are involved (ie trivial or otherwise)? I mean,
presumably they can't cut and paste the results to the mailing list but
are we going to see anything other than a list of bug-fixes for
(apparently) unreported bugs?

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Glaesemann
Date:
Subject: Re: FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to PLCheck failure
Next
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Problemas with gram.y