Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST
Date
Msg-id 20060304102119.GB29180@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>)
Responses Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 12:15:46PM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Also getting rid of toast index and start using ctids directly would be
> a big bonus.
>
> When using direct ctids we could use either ctid chains or some sort of
> skiplist for access to N-th TOAST chunk.

I suppose this would mean that you couldn't use vacuum on the toast
table anymore. Or teach vacuum that everytime it moves a tuple it needs
to update the original table (sequential scan). What exactly are you
trying to save here?

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Problemas with gram.y