Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> At the risk of editorializing...
>
> * Allow for tables with more than a certain percent of free space to
> force new tuple allocation in the last few pages to come only from the
> FSM (prefering the earliest pages), with the intention of allowing the
> table to shrink
That seems too confusing.
> I also believe there's also a second TODO:
>
> * Allow FSM page hand-out on tables to be influenced by the clustered
> index. This would help maintain cluster order.
How would FSM know how to do that? I added it with a question mark.
-- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
