Where are we on this patch. It was reverted. I someone going to clean
it up so we can apply it?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> This patch appears seriously broken, in particular every routine I
> > >> looked at contained incorrect locking assumptions. Nor do I care
> > >> for using pg_depend for the purposes it's being used for here.
> >
> > > OK, how do we proceed? Revert or apply a second patch?
> >
> > I'd say revert; the patch is going to need significant rework.
>
> OK, patch reverted. Updated version attached. Please adjust and
> resubmit. Thanks.
>
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +